Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Fable 5.1 improves on Fable 5 across agentic coding, long-running workflows, front-end and visual code generation, finance, analysis, and knowledge work, with more concise plans and summaries. Anthropic retains prompts and outputs for 30 days; Zero Data Retention is not available.

  • Reasoning
  • Vision
  • Native PDF input
  • Tool Calling
  • Structured Output

Added Sep 1, 2026

Pricing

Auto routing · per 1M tokens
Input
$10.00
Output
$50.00
Cache read
$0.25
Compare provider prices

Specifications

Context window
1M
Max output
128K
Avg output (7d)
2.3K tokens
Longer than 95% of models

Benchmarks

Sourced from Artificial Analysis.

Intelligence Index

53.4

Better than 99% of models compared

Coding Index

81.6

Better than 99% of models compared

Agentic Index

57.9

Better than 99% of models compared

Agentic work

AutomationBench-AA

Workflow automation with guardrail penalties

59.4%

Better than 83% of models compared

AutomationBench-AA Tasks Completed

Fully completed workflows without guardrail violations

32.1%

Better than 55% of models compared

Harvey LAB-AA

Legal agentic work criterion pass rate

93.0%

Better than 84% of models compared

AA-Briefcase

Agentic knowledge work (Elo)

1675 Elo

Better than 97% of models compared

GDPval-AA v2

Economically valuable tasks (Elo)

1758 Elo

Better than 99% of models compared

Document reasoning

GDP.pdf

Professional PDF reasoning: all-pass rate

26.2%

Better than 90% of models compared

AA-LCR v1.1

Long context reasoning with updated grading

85.3%

Better than 99% of models compared

MLCR-AA

Medical long-context reasoning

71.1%

Better than 98% of models compared

Reasoning

HLE

Humanity's Last Exam

59.1%

Better than 99% of models compared

CritPt

Research-level physics reasoning

29.7%

Coding

Terminal-Bench v4.0

Practical coding and terminal tasks

52.0%

Better than 93% of models compared

SciCode

Python programming for scientific computing

63.1%

Better than 99% of models compared

Knowledge

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Proportion of correctly answered questions

67.2%

AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate

Rate of incorrect answers among non-correct responses

72.6%

Legacy benchmarks

GPQA Diamond (legacy)

Graduate-level scientific reasoning

93.7%

Better than 98% of models compared

AA-LCR (unversioned / legacy)

Long context reasoning evaluation

85.3%

Better than 99% of models compared

GDPval-AA (unversioned / legacy)

Economically valuable tasks

62.7%

Last updated Oct 14, 2026

Artificial Analysis

Providers

Auto routing is available for this model. Explicit provider selection is not available.

Loading provider options…